Tell a stranger you are a mechanical engineer and you get the familiar reaction: eyes widen, heads nod, someone says "wow, you must be smart." At grocery store lines and family reunions, people imagine rockets or robots and assume you are wealthy or ingenious. The National Academy of Engineering found that engineering as a profession falls "in the middle of the pack" in public prestige, well below medicine, nursing, science, and teaching (NAE, 2008). Less than half of Americans can accurately describe what engineers do (NSF, 2014). Your aunt is not impressed by your work. She is impressed by a word she does not understand.
Inside the profession, the myth collapses. The National Science Foundation's 2021 National Survey of College Graduates asked employed engineers across every discipline how satisfied they are with their work. Mechanical engineers reported the lowest "very satisfied" rate of any named engineering discipline: 41.2 percent. Civil engineers: 52.8 percent. Electrical: 49.1 percent. Chemical: 47.5 percent. Aerospace: 44.1 percent (NSF, 2023). ME also reported the highest dissatisfaction rate: 9.5 percent, compared to 6.8 percent for electrical and 7.3 percent for industrial. The dominant experience among mechanical engineers is not enthusiasm. It is tolerance. Nearly half, 49 percent, described themselves as merely "somewhat satisfied," a federal euphemism for enduring. See Reason #14.
The satisfaction gap reflects the work. You already know from this blog that 7 percent of MEs work in dedicated R&D and the other 84 percent sustain, validate, and comply (See Reason #7). You know that 72 percent of the typical ME's week is documentation, meetings, and gate reviews, not design (See Reason #9). The prestige your aunt assigns you is based on an image of invention. The work the market assigns you is Rev E to Rev F. Even the staffing firms see the dissatisfaction as a business opportunity. Aerotek surveyed 150 mechanical engineers and found that the single largest gap between what they want from their careers and what they actually get is whether their manager cares about their development (Aerotek/MDRG, 2020). The report's conclusion: contract engineers are happier. The report's sponsor: a company that places contract engineers (See Reason #59). You imagined design. You got a queue of ECOs and a supervisor who does not know your name.
The wage data confirms the hierarchy from a different angle. ME's median of $102,320 sits below every other major engineering branch except civil. Software developers earn $133,080. Aerospace earns $133,290. Chemical: $112,100. Electrical: $111,910 (BLS, 2024). The market does not pay prestige prices for the work most MEs do. It pays sustaining prices. See Reason #18.
The prestige ladder is real, and it runs in reverse. The farther you are from the actual work, the more impressed people are with your title. A layperson calls you a genius. An engineering student calls it a solid choice. A civil engineer asks what you actually design. An electrical engineer notes that mechanical is useful, just not very scalable. A software engineer wonders why you still use AutoCAD. An ME with ten years in the field hands you a drink and sighs. The federal government measured that sigh. It is the lowest satisfaction rate in engineering.
You are not building tomorrow (See Reason #14). You are updating a drawing that goes from Rev E to Rev F. And 41.2 percent of the people doing it with you could not bring themselves to call it very satisfying.
References:
Aerotek/MDRG. (2020). Overcoming inertia: Propelling mechanical engineering careers forward. https://www.aerotek.com/en/-/media/files/aerotek/pdfs/aerotek-mechanicalengineers-report-june2020.pdf
Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2024). Occupational employment and wage statistics, May 2024. https://www.bls.gov/oes/2023/may/oes172141.htm
National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/12187/changing-the-conversation-messages-for-improving-public-understanding-of-engineering
National Science Foundation. (2014). Science and engineering indicators 2014, Chapter 7. https://gwern.net/doc/science/2014-nsfnsb-scienceandengineeringindicators2014-ch7.pdf
National Science Foundation. (2023). National Survey of College Graduates, 2021 (NSF 23-306), Table 3-2. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf23306/assets/data-tables/tables/nsf23306-tab003-002.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment